Top Digital Agency

Frontend Web Dev For Hedge Fund Platform

5.0

They provided good communication and project management process to support our needs.

Client’s Clutch Review

Project Feedback

Ecom Development NYC's developers completed their work on schedule and to the client's specifications. They responded well to feedback and quickly made requested changes. Communication was smooth and open — they implemented a shared file storing environment and met frequently over Skype.

They provided good communication and project management process to support our needs.

Client Rating

5.0

Quality: 5.0

Cost: 5.0

Schedule: 5.0

Would Refer: 5.0

Project Feedback

Project Summary

Web Development

May - Oct. 2021

$10,000 to $49,999

Client
Chuck Harris

Owner & Lead Technical, Stock Pilot LLC

About
I'm the owner and technical lead of a social hedge fund platform used by trading firms and online communities.

Employees
1-10

Location

The Client

Please describe your company and your position there?
"I'm the owner and technical lead of a social hedge fund platform used by trading firms and online communities."

The Challenge

For what projects/services did your company hire Ecom Development NYC, and what were your goals?
"We hired Ecom Development NYC for the development of our client facing angular web application. The goal of this project was front-end development of multiple dashboards used by various roles, along with registration flows and home page."

The Approach

How did you select this vendor and what were the deciding factors?
"We selected this vendor based on their reviews via on online resource. Displayed quick understanding of requirements during initial estimation process. Were able to work with us regarding pricing and remained flexible enough to work through specific details as we progressed, proving beneficial given our beta environment."

Describe the scope of work in detail, including the project steps, key deliverables, and technologies used.
"Ecom Development NYC did core development of custom front-end Angular/Typescript web application. Stock Pilot led design of front-end screens and communicate these items to Ecom Development NYC as development progressed. Stock Pilot developed back end services to support web application. Both parties participated in integration and testing throughout the process."

How many people from the vendor's team worked with you, and what were their positions?
"There was a project manager, architect, lead developer and I believe some other developers available to us through the several months of development. Most communication occurred with the lead developer, with snippets throughout with project manager and architect. Team was always available and quick to respond to any inquiries we had across all the above noted roles."

The Outcome

Can you share any measurable outcomes of the project or general feedback about the deliverables?
"The project development good and completed in a timely manner. The deliverables completed to the specified requirements and any minor changes requested after initially review were always quickly accepted and completed."

Describe their project management style, including communication tools and timeliness.
"The general project management lifecycle consisted of the following: 1-Initial meetings regarding requirement discussions, cost and time estimations. 2-Once work agreed upon, Ecom Development NYC established base filestore environment, and open Skype communication channels with all of allotted team members. 3-On weekly-ish basis had open communications with development lead, and over full time of development had several milestone meetings with project management and architect. Note: regarding timeliness, responded promptly to any inquiries and were easily available for video meetings when applicable."

What did you find most impressive or unique about this company?
"They provided good communication and project management process to support our needs. Team was flexible as requirements grew throughout development process."

Are there any areas for improvement or something they could have done differently?
"No"